The somewhat Apple-esque packaging for the Valet router I tried out was covered with aspirational taglines such as “Home wireless made easy” and “Welcome to the new home wireless experience.” #Cisco valet connector setup am10 plusSetting setup aside, Cisco has definitely come up with some nice Wi-Fi management software-but I wish there were a way to sell people Wi-Fi gear without removing the technical information that explains how one product differs from another.Īt launch, the Valet line consists of three items: the $100 Valet and $150 Valet Plus Wi-Fi routers, and a $100 USB adapter. It's at version 2.0.01.Can setting up a Wi-Fi network ever be drop-dead easy for non-technical folks? Maybe not, but Cisco gives the problem its best shot with a new brand, Valet, that will co-exist with Cisco’s well known Linksys line, now being positioned as “enthusiast” products. If I brick my M10 will I be able to use tftp (or other method) to return to stock? Also I already updated the fw on it to the latest provided by Cisco. Yes, I know, the E1000 has a fancier case colour and the stock firmware may have some extra features (Easy WPS connect?) that the others don't have, but that is basically what differs between them. There is no difference between an 160v3, an M10 or an E1000, it is only the E2000 and E3000 that has got the bigger nvram. I've just had the chance to check an E1000 cfe (thanks to barryware who bought a router only for making dd-wrt support possible). Although I suppose once someone gets it on their M10 they can just rip the CFE and share for all. That's why you see WRT610v2 users all putting the E3000 CFE on their routers, etc. In otherwords: larger nvram space compared to the identical hardware they replaced. #Cisco valet connector setup am10 seriesThe M series is just like the E series afaik. Less chance of someone screwing theirs up lol. Testing Multiple Routers - Bootloader Collection Project - My Wiki Only going to leave the files here for a few brave souls and then remove them. Last edited by Orbiting234 on Fri 5:49 edited 1 time in total Sounds like if you are going to run DD-WRT on it there is no reason to as I was incorrect in thinking the M10 had more nvram allocated than the 160Nv3. #Cisco valet connector setup am10 softwareNice, but what good would it do (other than for testing purposes) to convert my WRT160Nv3 to a M10?Įdit: Well, I guess the only reason would be to use the Cisco Connect software really. Last edited by Orbiting234 on Fri 6:28 edited 3 times in total That being said, yes Eko, this build does flash to my M10 just fine. I just bought it today to replace a WRT150n that died on me so I don't want to risk killing this one yet.Įdit: It doesn't matter since nvram size is the same. Do you have this router? Why don't you be the pioneer? No, otherwise would have a feedback here. If the router still has issues, I will be flashing the M10. The installation went perfectly and I'm using that one for now and I will be returning the M10 to the store if all goes well. I just flashed my old WRT160N V3 (I had trashed it due to stability problems) since I had nothing to lose. I don't think I'll be installing this firmware. Last edited by LOM on Thu 14:04 edited 1 time in total Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! Downloaded 3 times so far - reports anyone ?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |